Silko and most of her stories come from a Native American community called Laguna Pueblo, which, from what I understand, is somewhere in the New Mexico/Arizona region. Storytelling in this particular Native American culture is much different from that of our Anglo-style of storytelling. While the traditional western style of storytelling is often associated with individual authorship and linear stories that are written by one and meant to be read by many, the storytelling style of the Pueblo people involves many different contributors and a lot of their stories are simply oral tradition. A big part of their oral tradition is that a story can only develop through several different accounts of it because each new person to tell the story brings something new to the narrative.
So after seeing all of that, I came to the conclusion that "Storyteller" was not meant to be a straightforward narrative, but rather a story about the essence of the storytelling style of Silko's fellow people. The reason that the story seems so chaotic in the way of organization is because it's exemplifying the many different ways a story can be told. I'm not sold on the fact that all of the different sections of the story are different takes on the same narrative, but I can see how someone could take that stance. All in all it was quite confusing upon the first read, but a little research on the author kind of brought it back around for me to where I can at least grasp what Silko was setting out to do.
In all honesty I never thought about the fact that the Storyteller was not meant to be a narrative but to show the many different storytelling styles. That actually makes a lot of sense because all three stories were told in different ways. Some parts were easy to follow and then others were harder to follow because of the chaos that was going on. The background info was very helpful and shows why it is important to research authors before or even after you read.
ReplyDelete